Decoding the Target Size Maze: A Deep Dive into WCAG 2.2 Success Criteria

October 12, 2023


Ah, the digital world—a place where pixels matter, especially when it comes to the size of interactive elements. If you've ever found yourself squinting at your screen, trying to tap a minuscule button, you know the struggle is real. But fear not! The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 has got you covered. Today, we're dissecting two Success Criteria that deal with target size: Target Size (Minimum) and Target Size (Enhanced). Buckle up; it's going to be an enlightening ride!

Target Size (Minimum): Let's Get the Facts Straight

First off, let's correct a common misconception. The Target Size (Minimum) Success Criterion, also known as SC 2.5.5, specifies that the size of the target for pointer inputs should be at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels, not 44 by 44 as often misunderstood. This criterion does have its exceptions, such as inline elements and controls that appear on the screen due to user interaction.

Key Takeaways

  • Minimum Size: 24 by 24 CSS pixels (Yes, you read that right!)
  • Exceptions: Inline elements, user-activated controls, essential elements
  • WCAG Level: AA

Target Size (Enhanced): The Overachiever of Target Sizes

Now, if you're the kind of person who likes to go above and beyond, meet Target Size (Enhanced) or SC 2.5.12. This criterion recommends a target size of 44 by 44 CSS pixels for all interactive elements and is more stringent in its exceptions.

Key Takeaways

  • Minimum Size: 44 by 44 CSS pixels
  • Exceptions: Limited, mostly concerning essential elements
  • WCAG Level: AAA

The Showdown: Minimum vs. Enhanced—A Detailed Comparison

Ah, the moment you've all been waiting for—the showdown between Target Size (Minimum) and Target Size (Enhanced). Think of it as the "Marvel vs. DC" of accessibility guidelines. Let's dig into the nitty-gritty details, shall we?

Level of Compliance: The Stakes

  • Target Size (Minimum): This is your entry ticket to the world of accessibility, meeting the Level AA compliance. It's like the appetizer before the main course—necessary but not the whole meal.
  • Target Size (Enhanced): This is for those who want to go the extra mile. We're talking Level AAA compliance, the crème de la crème of accessibility. It's the dessert with the cherry on top!

Exceptions: The Fine Print

Target Size (Minimum) Exceptions:

  • Inline Elements: If your target is part of a block of text, it gets a free pass. Think of inline links within a paragraph.
  • User-Activated Controls: If a control appears on the screen due to a user's action, like a dropdown menu, it's exempt.
  • Essential Elements: If altering the target size would mess up the intended functionality, then it's excused. For example, a piano keyboard app where the keys must be a certain size to allow for chords.
  • Equivalent Targets: If the same action can be performed by another target on the same page, the smaller target gets a pass.

Target Size (Enhanced) Exceptions:

  • Essential Elements: Similar to the Minimum criterion, if changing the size would compromise the functionality, it's exempt. But that's pretty much it. This one's a tough cookie!

Application: Who Wears It Best?

  • Target Size (Minimum): Ideal for most websites and applications that aim for broad compliance. It's like your everyday jeans—versatile and fits most occasions.
  • Target Size (Enhanced): Best suited for platforms that need to offer an exceptional level of accessibility. Think healthcare or educational websites. This is your tuxedo or evening gown—reserved for special occasions.

So, there you have it—the ultimate showdown between Target Size (Minimum) and Target Size (Enhanced). Whether you're Team Minimum or Team Enhanced, the goal remains the same: creating a more accessible and user-friendly digital world.

Why Size Matters: The Impact and Benefits

The Impact of Tiny Targets

Ever tried playing darts blindfolded? That's what using a website with tiny targets feels like. Small interactive elements can lead to:

  • Frustration: Users might abandon the task or even the website.
  • Errors: Accidental clicks can result in unintended actions.
  • Inaccessibility: Users with motor impairments find it especially challenging.

The Benefits of Adhering to These Criteria

  • User Experience: Larger targets make for a smoother, more enjoyable user experience.
  • Inclusivity: Making your website accessible to people with motor impairments is not just good ethics; it's good business.
  • Reduced Bounce Rates: Happy fingers mean happy users, which means they're more likely to stick around.

Conclusion: Size Does Matter

Whether you're aiming for the basics with Target Size (Minimum) or shooting for the stars with Target Size (Enhanced), one thing is clear: size does matter. And while we're not saying that adhering to these criteria will solve all of life's problems, it will make the digital world a more accessible place.

At Zenyth, we're all about helping you hit that target—literally. We specialize in helping businesses achieve WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance, ensuring that your digital platforms are not just accessible but genuinely user-friendly. So, if you're ready to take your website from a game of "pin the tail on the donkey" to a well-aimed bullseye, contact us today.

Share this post